Writing Tip of the Day: Stop and Smell the Roses

I’m no poet.  I never had much interest in being one.  That doesn’t mean that I don’t admire a poetic turn of phrase.

Sometimes, writing a prose novel becomes an exercise in accidental poetry.  The writing is really coming to you and then all of a sudden a phrase finds its way into your fingers that makes you pause.  You realize: Huh, not bad.  That actually sounds real nice and clever.  It sounds like the real deal, but it doesn’t feel like the real deal purely because it felt like an accident. Continue reading

Posted in Guides and Tips, Writing Practices | Leave a comment

Gondor in Space

John Noble, known to fantasy geeks as Denethor of Peter Jackson’s Rings trilogy, wants to be in Star Wars.  IGN has the scoop.

He certainly would fit in nicely in my mind.

One thing the prequels got right was casting. Unfortunately, Lucas couldn’t handle the great cast he assembled.

My young self was not fully cognizant of just how amazing it was that Liam Neeson was cast to spearhead the new Star Wars trilogy.  I remember the vague description of his character as a ‘venerable Jedi knight’ and thought it sounded cool, but knowing how great Neeson is now, I’m almost glad I didn’t fully get it then.  My expectations would have been that much higher.  It’s not that Neeson proved to be bad or anything, but the character didn’t deliver (and no actor could have made more of it).  Only Ewan McGregor ultimately fulfilled the promise of his inspired casting. Continue reading

Posted in Star Wars | 1 Comment

The Game of Thrones Dilemma

When the first Harry Potter film came out, J.K. Rowling had only written four of seven books.  The Chamber of Secrets came out exactly a year later, and Rowling still hadn’t published a new edition.

Fans were worried: without the series finished, how could the children continue playing their roles?  Would they want to be in seven movies?  Would they be too old by the time the last books were ready for adaptation?

Obviously, these worries were unnecessary.  Everything worked out fine.

Worries over Game of Thrones, however, do not seem as unfounded.  It’s been discussed at length elsewhere: how can Martin possibly finish books six and seven before the filmmakers are ready to film (much less write and prepare) books six and seven?

Here’s the dilemma as it stands: Continue reading

Posted in game of thrones | 1 Comment

Netflix’s New ‘Development’

I watched the entirety of Arrested Development: Season Four over the past forty-eight hours.

Already, I see critics eager to pounce and declare the new episodes subpar.

How fast we go from demanding its return to hastening its burial.

Here are a few thoughts in its defense (Mild Spoiler Alert):

1) As many have said, the later episodes pick up speed.  This is not a happy coincidence.  That’s because they are chapters, not episodes.  I haven’t seen House of Cards, but it apparently unfolds similarly.  Netflix is doing something exciting here.   No longer must a television show develop from episode to episode as its own cohesive mini-unit built to keep audience interest for an entire week.

This is far more novel-like.  The episodes unfold like a book that has no intention of spelling out every single detail and plot twist.  True enough, the fact alone that everything is interconnected from chapter one to chapter fifteen doesn’t make this ‘funny’ per se.  It does make it as elaborate as we’ve come to expect from series creator Mitch Hurwitz.

The experience of Netflix TV viewing is always strange.  You are constantly watching with the ghost of the show’s first run in the back of your mind: Oh this must have been difficult to wait a whole summer to see resolved!  I can see how people would think this season was losing steam but I didn’t notice too much because of the binge-watching effect.

This no longer has that, and it’s difficult to think of it as a new medium…but it is, and this is the perfect show to help introduce it.

2) This novel-like structure is both interesting artistically and practical.  It obviously solves the problem of featuring actors who (some as a result of this show) are now quite busy.  By focusing on their stories independently and building up a mosaic, the creators were able to bring the characters together without being able to constantly have all the actors together.

Many do not like this, but I admire how Hurwitz makes it a thematic focus point: the family is in shambles.  They are broken and scattered.  The one son trying to keep them all together can no longer do so, nor does he want to.  This was the right place for the story to move and just as sometimes we have to watch our characters take some time apart from one another, this was worth doing so.  Why wipe away where Season 3 had led us just because we wanted the whole gang back to the status quo?

3) The jokes pay off.  The thing that people forget about the original show is that the jokes were designed to pay off after repetition.  ”No touching” was never particularly funny on its own; it was the consistency with which it was used and the endless variation that eventually made it funny.  Does the ostrich gag work in the same way?  No, but there is plenty to enjoy.  Fakeblock.  Anustart.  Barry’s ladder.  To catch a predator.  Gob’s love interest.

Did I find it “as funny” as before.  No.  I also found Season 3 to have dipped in quality, and thought it was fine for it to end as it did.  We were the ones who demanded more.  I am happy they gave in.  It was a joy to see everyone, and not just the people we knew were coming back.  Don’t forget Barry Zuckerkorn, Lucille 2, Bob Loblaw, Sally Sitwell, Gene Parmesan, Carl Weathers, the many Richters, Tony Wonder.

This was no prequel-sized dip in quality.  It was new but not derivative, different but not unfamiliar, and inventive but never insulting.

If Season 5 or a movie is in the works, I will gladly devote another weekend to its viewing.

Posted in Television Shows | Leave a comment

Trekkers go into darkness

This is a full spoiler discussion of Star Trek: Into Darkness so beware.

Audiences are generally distrusting of “rip offs.”  I, for one, can’t stand Family Guy.  I find it derivative of The Simpsons in a nauseating way and have never seen an episode that rivals the craft that made The Simpsons great at its height.

But surely we can tell the difference between stealing and retelling.  A retelling is a conscious act.  Did Peter Jackson steal from the 1933 King Kong when he had his Kong make his last stand on top of the Empire State Building?  Of course not.  We expected as much.

Why then do people seem so shocked that Star Trek: Into Darkness retells key moments from Wrath of Khan? Continue reading

Posted in Star Trek | 2 Comments

Writer’s Block vs. Writer’s Boredom: Some tips

I associate Writer’s Block with the inability to find an idea worth writing.  I find, however, that the affliction that more often hits me is “Writer’s Boredom.”  I have the idea, I’m pretty sure it’s a good one, and I (theoretically) want to write it–but I just can’t bring myself to do it.

By and large, I try to get my daily tasks done as efficiently as possible so that I have more time each day to write, but when “Writer’s Boredom” sets in, I find myself more enamored with the daily tasks that I know to be (ultimately) busy work.  I’ll spend more time on them because I want to avoid staring at my writing doc for five seconds before the pull to procrastinate online wins me over.

Here are a few tips I’ve found to end the boredom: Continue reading

Posted in Guides and Tips, Uncategorized | 3 Comments

SHIELDs up

While I would be curious about this show even if it had nothing to do with Whedon, any return to TV from the master is cause for celebration:

 

Posted in Video of the Week | 1 Comment

Another GRRM delay

Hopefully the only reason this book is delayed is that Martin is busy finishing up The Winds of Winter.  Otherwise, we are in trouble…

Posted in News and Links | Leave a comment

Star Wars Tip of the Day: Start with myth not story

How can Star Wars learn to be Star Wars again?  Here is my daily tip for whoever is listening at Abrams and company on how to recapture what the prequels lost.

Tip: Start with myth not story

I already see it: they have to bring Vader back.  Luke has to be an Obi-Wan like figure.  It should be about Han and Leia’s children.

What makes Star Wars great is the mythic qualities.  A boy coming of age by redeeming the evils of his father set against a backdrop of a new society coming into being by ending the evils of a previous generation’s government.

The mythology of the prequels was already set by default.  It had to be the opposite: a boy falling into evil, a society falling from democracy to fascism.

There is no natural mythology for Star Wars 7-9 to draw upon.  If Abrams wants this new trilogy to be what the old one was then he and his writers have to find a simple human story that follows naturally after Luke’s story and can be told across three films.

I don’t know what that story is or could be, but what makes this more exciting than the prequels is that the right story is out there and we do not already know it.  They just have to find it.

Posted in Star Wars | 1 Comment

Williams vs. Zimmer

Have a listen to Hans Zimmer’s new Superman theme (from Man of Steel).

I was skeptical of the choice to use Zimmer/James Newton Howard for Nolan’s Batman trilogy when Danny Elfman’s theme from the Burton movies seemed so iconic.

I now far prefer the music from Nolan’s films.

Having said that, Danny Elfman is not John Williams, and I’m not sure anything could ever compete with his Superman theme.  I will, however, wait until I see this music in the context of the film before offering a final judgement.

Posted in News and Links | Leave a comment